Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. topic

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Roy Smith <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Chris Angelico <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Roy Smith <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> >> Python 2.8j?
>> >
>> > You're imagining things.
>>
>> Get real... s'not gonna happen.
>>
> I wouldn't bet on that. The situation keeps getting tensor and tensor.

I can't complain, really. This was a perfectly rational discussion
until I suggested "e.1".

ChrisA