[Q] (AT&T) Best path to 4.4.2 from 4.4? topic

My setup: 4.4 ATT Moto X, Rooted (by way of latest jcase method), Locked bootloader, and I'm pretty sure write protection is off (though I don't remember how to check)

What I am wanting to know is how would and should I be able to get to 4.4.2, and get my root back (as I'm not confident any method will be able to "keep" my root safely without screwing something else up)? What's the best way based on my setup, and what files or tools would I need(stock 4.4 or 4.4.2 ROM, a new recovery image, etc)?

Since the root method I used hijacks the recovery, I suppose I technically don't have a functional one (other than it maintaining my root). Do I even need a custom recovery? I don't ever plan to flash anything other than basic stock firmware, though I may toy around with Xposed in the future. Also as a sidenote, im currently using ART instead of Dalvik. If any method or technique might conflict with that (other than Xposed), then let me know to the best of your knowledge.

Safe ROM evolution path topic

Many of us love to install and test new ROMs on our devices. One of the things that I have suffered the most is how to know if my current ROM can be upgraded to a different one.

Lets use this thread to comment if

I have already tested:

FROM ....................................... TO .................................................. .......................... Method
B125 (international) ..................... CyanogenMod 10.1 (surdu_petru) ................................ root + CWM + TWRP
CyanogenMod 10.1 ..................... B120 (international) .................................................. .. dload + 3-button autoinstall
B125 .......................................... HYD52ROM V2 (husen4u) .......................................... root + CWM + TWRP
HYD52ROM V2 ........................... B120 (international) .................................................. .. dload + 3-button autoinstall

Does anyone know if I can flash B120 CN being on CyanogenMod for International based on B125?

[Help] Path of Exile. topic

Hello there.
I was wandering if there was any hack-exploit except maphack for PoE.
Saw yesterday that maybe you can edit your drop rate.
Tried a bit with CE but of course it's no use.

If anyone has any info please pm me or reply to thread.
Thanks.

building "path expressions" topic

On 1/23/2014 11:37 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> When creating an interface for a library, sometimes one wants the user
> to see nesting in a »path expression«, like for example »a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h«
> to convey the idea that h is a part of g, which is a part of f, and so on.
>
> I think it is funny that one can use either package names /or/ nested
> classes /or/ fields to implement such a path, without this choice being
> visible in the »path expression«. For example, one posssibility to
> implement a »path expression« »a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h« might be:
>
> package a.b.c;
> class G { int h = 8; }
> class F { G g = new G(); }
> class d { static class e { static F f = new F(); }}
> public final class Main
> { public static void main( String[] args )

ITYM "java.lang.String[]", also "class a.b.c.G",
"a.b.c.G g = new a.b.c.G();", etc. ;-)

> { java.lang.System.out.println( a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h ); }}

If it seems funny to you, your sense of humor is more
finely developed than mine. :)

Just for the record, note that the "a.b.c" part is
different from the rest. Packages have no hierarchical
relationship, that is, package "a.b.c" is unrelated to
"a.b.x" and even to "a.b". To put it another way, the
path "a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h" has six elements ("a.b.c" and five
more), not eight.

--
Eric Sosman
(E-Mail Removed)d