On Sat, 2014-01-25, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> i think so c++ is more complicated when compared to c.
Like Juha (?) likes to say: more complicated language, less
complicated application-specific code. If the complication hits me
over and over and over again, I prefer if the language deals with it.
Implementing linked lists gets boring when you've done it a few times.
> And also the
> many keywords are used to perform only one application.
I don't understand that sentence. Also, to which posting are you
responding? Is it some posting from the 1990s, resurrected by the
broken Google interface?
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
> i think so c++ is more complicated when compared to c.
Like Juha (?) likes to say: more complicated language, less
complicated application-specific code. If the complication hits me
over and over and over again, I prefer if the language deals with it.
Implementing linked lists gets boring when you've done it a few times.
> And also the
> many keywords are used to perform only one application.
I don't understand that sentence. Also, to which posting are you
responding? Is it some posting from the 1990s, resurrected by the
broken Google interface?
/Jorgen
--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire